In logical terms, Paley’s watchmaker argument is an argument by analogy. Explain Hume’s critique of the argument, in logical terms.
Is this your assignment or some part of it?
We can do it for you! Click to Order!
Related posts:
- In M1: Assignment 2, you identified and explained the weakest or strongest argument in a set of articles. You identified the premises and conclusions, discussed whether or not an inference was warranted, and discussed matters of truth and consistency within the specified subject. Review your work in M1: Assignment 2 where you analyzed the sets of articles assigned to you. Using these articles, complete the following: Construct an original “engulf and devour” argument. Or Develop a “counterexample” argument. You may use the M1: Assignment 2 readings as sources for evidence and facts. Be sure to do the following: Use additional references to support your arguments and provide evidence as needed. Use key language and phrases suggested in your textbook. If you have difficulty getting started use the “quick start” techniques listed in the textbook. Write your initial response in 1–2 paragraphs. Apply APA standards to citation of sources.
- Write a 250-word (minimum) reflection on the Toumin argument paper. Discuss what you have learned during the the Toulmin argument paper assignment and how it will assist you in upcoming papers. Include your strategies for capitalizing on your strengths and overcoming your weaknesses in order to become a successful writer. Remember to post your original reflection by Thur to provide time for a reply.
- Which argument of Friedman’s do you most agree with? Which argument do you most disagree with? What do you think is the most important or interesting thing Friedman talks about?
- Identifying Misleading Information in an Argument
- “Why do physicians and nurses kill more people than airline pilots?” Apply your critical thinking skills to this argument and critique the statement. First, do you think it’s true? If it is, what do you think about their rationale? How would you address it if the question were posed to you in a forum?
- Argument Papers #1 and #2 (2 @ 17 pts. each 3-5 pages
- Basing your argument on the christian believe that God is all powerful, discuss in about one page double spaced whether God can create a stick with one side. Use APA in your citations.
- Final Argument Paper: Does one have an obligation to report wrong doings by one’s employer, even when doing so will result in the loss of one’s job? Are whistle-blower laws effective and necessary
- Summarize two of the authors’ arguments. Identify and discuss one further implication of one of those arguments. Considering the author is “right,” what sorts of claims or facts would follow from that argument?
- Reflection on the Toumin argument paper
