The NJ Human Rights commission found that Pollard was the victim of sexual harassment and disparate treatment. Please answer these questions:a.Provide the most current definition of “sexual harassment,” including a definition of quid pro quo and hostile environment sexual harassment. Name an appellate court case in which an employer was found liable for either quid pro quo or hostile environment sexual harassment. Describe the facts of the case and the decision the court came to in the case. Include the citation to the case and a link to it online. Would the case apply to Pollard’s case? Why or why not? Would you want to use this case in Teddy’s favor or Pollard’s favor? (10 points)
Is this your assignment or some part of it?
We can do it for you! Click to Order!
